1 Corinthians

Marriage. 7:1-28

Introduction
      In this chapter Paul addresses the contention " it is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman". Clearly some of the Corinthians regarded themselves as "angels". They were now living in a heaven on earth, a realized eschatology which superseded earthly activities such as sex. Most likely the problem centred on a group of "spiritual" women. Paul does not condemn their enthusiasm to abstain from sex ("deprive"), but rather guides them with the principle that "marriage is no sin." In arguing his case Paul affirms singularity, but then encourages the path of marriage. He uses the same logic with tongues - tongues are great, "I speak in tongues more than any of you", but prophecy is better. He sets a guideline which is "remain in the place you were at the time of your call", "do not seek a change in status." The basis for this principle, which is not a "command from the Lord", is the immediacy of Christ's return. Although he has applied this guideline to himself, it is nothing more than good advice. In the end "it is better to marry than burn."

The passage
      v1-7. Most commentators have assumed that v1b was Paul's position on marriage. Paul felt it best not to marry, but because of natural sexual urges it is best to have a marriage partner. Yet it is most likely that Paul is quoting the "spiritual" believers at Corinth, possibly even quoting from their letter to him. If this is the case, Paul is opposing their position. Humans are created with natural drives and to deny those drives will only lead to immorality. In marriage, where each "submits to one another out of reverence for Christ", sexual favours should not be denied. Both partners may agree to abstain for a period of prayer, but there must be limits to this. So Paul concurs with their sentiment and wishes that many more had the "gift" of celibacy (a gift of freedom from sexual need) as he does, but such is a natural gift from God, as is the gift of a sexual bonding drive, therefore each must naturally express their gift.
      v8-9. It is unfortunate that these verses imply that the only purpose of marriage is to satisfy sexual passion. This is not Paul's point. The unmarried and widows are being pressured to stay unmarried as a spiritual exercise. For Paul, that is acceptable if you have the "gift", as he has. Without the gift it is best to get married otherwise frustration will lead to immorality. It is possible that the "unmarried" are divorcees. This is an interesting idea as it would confirm that Jesus' words on divorce were but an ideal of perfection that serves to expose our state of loss before God. This is why Jesus' disciples exclaim, "it's best not to get married." This would not solve the problem as then we would be overcome by lust. Luckily it is by grace that we are saved and not by works.
      v10-11. Again addressing the asceticism of the "spiritual" women, Paul speaks strongly against going even further than abstinence, namely divorce. Findlay argues that the husbands are divorcing their "spiritual" wives and so Paul's exhortation is that the wives should resist the divorce and seek reconciliation. What is clear is that Paul is not establishing eternal Cannon Law for the church.
      v12-16. It is most likely that the "spiritual" regard a marriage contaminated when their partner is an unbeliever. Thus they have argued for divorce. Paul states his opinion that they should stay with their partner if all is well with the marriage, as both their partner and children will come under the sound of the gospel and may well be converted. If the unbelieving partner wants out of the marriage, then in that circumstance divorce is a reasonable option.
      v17-24. Paul now clearly states his guiding principle. "They should remain in whatever social setting they were in at the time of their call since God's call to be in Christ transcends such settings so as to make them essentially irrelevant", Gordon Fee. He illustrates his point with reference to circumcision and slavery. Whether Jew or Gentile, both count for nothing. Similarly slavery or freedom, although he does qualify this with the encouragement to gain freedom where possible. Still, his point stands. In the end slavery or freedom are irrelevant for a believer in Christ. As Jesus himself put it, "my Kingdom is not of this world."
      v25-28. The "spiritual" have argued that "it is good for the virgins to remain as they are", and Paul agrees (with qualifications - "better to marry than burn", and if they do marry they "have not sinned"). Of course Paul agrees for different reasons. It is "because of the present crises". Those who are married will have to "face many troubles" and he wants "to spare" them. The RSV translates it "in view of the impending distress". Paul is probably referring to the coming tribulation upon the church prior to the return of Christ. The responsibilities of family will make it hard to "flee" in that terrible day.

Discussion
      1. Although our body belongs to our marriage partner (v1-7), Is it healthy to always submit to their sexual advances. If not why not?
      2. Why isn't celibacy a greater spiritual gift?
      3. This passage doesn't actually prohibit divorce. Discuss
      4.. An unbelieving partner is "sanctified" in a Christian marriage (v12-16), but does that mean a believer should maintain a failed marriage?
      5. If Christ's Kingdom is not of this world and thus social structures are neither here nor there (v17-24), what does that say about the present drive for "relevance" in the Anglican church?
      6. How should we respond to the coming tribulation (v25-28)?