Textual notes
Abbreviations,
Bibliography
Having completed his theological argument, Paul now turns to the business of Jewish and Gentile believers living together within God's new community, 12:1-15:13. An overarching concern in this section is the community's witness to the world through the life of its members. First, in chapter 12, Paul deals with personal ethics and then in chapter 13 he goes on to deal with wider social issues.
Having explained a believer's duties toward the civil authorities, 13:1-7, Paul goes on to speak of the duty to love one another, for "love is the fulfilling of the law", 13:8-10. Paul then makes the point that all these duties are to be viewed in the knowledge that salvation is nearer now than when we first believed; "the night is far gone, the day is at hand", 13:11-14.
v8
ofeilete (ofeilew) pres. imp. "debt" - owe. "Do not owe anything to anyone."
peplhrwken (plhrow) perf. "has fulfilled" - complete. "To love your neighbor is to fulfill the whole law", Barclay.
v9
anakefalaioutai (anakefalaiow) pres. pas. "summed up" - the gathering up of a large number of details under a single statement or heading.
ton plhsion adv. "neighbor" - the neighbor. It is worth noting that "neighbour" always referred to a fellow-Israelite, and so for us it refers to our fellow-believer. This does not mean we should not care for the rest of humanity. We must "do good to all men", but "love the brotherhood". We need to remember that God's special love is for his children, while simultaneously he sends "rain on the just and the unjust alike."
wJV seauton "as yourself" - The command that we love our brother as we love ourselves is not promoting self-love as such, rather it recognizes our selfishness and uses this self-interest as a gauge to define, in practical terms, our obligation toward others.
v10
ouk ergazetai (ergazomai) pres. "does no harm" - not to do, to work. "Love toward a neighbour does not work evil." The commandments give shape to the law of love and therefore, perfect love perfectly fulfills the law (an impossible ideal).
v11
Kai touto "and [do] this" - "and this" is a particular Greek form used to further develop a previous point. We are to love our neighbor in the knowledge that Christ's return is near.
eidonteV (oida) perf. part. "understanding" - knowing. Know something to be true. "In doing this you must know that the decisive hour has come", TNT.
ton kairon (os) "present time" - the time, season, fitting season. Paul is encouraging us to read what is going on around us, the intertwining of circumstance in the passing of time. Christ's death and resurrection would be central to understanding the big picture. Paul, in the early part of his ministry, expected Christ's return during his own lifetime. Later, he accepted that he will not be alive at the time of the second coming. Here he is non committal, but he certainly sees the time getting away. The present moment is not a time for sleep; it is a time to be prepared. Of course, given that life is short, the day of judgement is indeed drawing near.
wJra "hour" - the construction here is best translated "it is time [for you to wake up......]"
egguteron (egguV) comp. adv. "nearer" - closer. Paul is most likely speaking of the parousia in time terms. He sees Christ's return as very close.
v12
proekoyen (prokoptw) aor. "nearly over" - advanced, gone forward.
enduswmeqa (enduw) aor. subj. "put on" - clothe yourself. Hortatory subjunctive. The Christian life is one of warfare and so we put on this goodness in the midst of a battle which propels us, "conforms" us, toward darkness. We clothe ourselves with goodness by putting on the righteousness of Christ, by grace through faith. We look to him to work his work of renewal in our lives.
v13
peripathswmen (peripatew) aor. subj. "let us behave" - walk about. Hortatory subjunctive. The word extends to the Christian walk, ie. behavior, conduct. Paul illustrates the darkness with three sets of ideas: drunken revelries, promiscuous debauchery and jealous brawling strife. Of course, drunkenness is the mother of all these.
euschmonwV adv. "decently" - becomingly. Used originally of graceful dress, but later of decent conduct.
v14
pronoian (a) "[do not] think about" - [do not make] plan, forethought, provision [to the lusts]. We are to focus on Christ rather than let our mind run loose and plan for sinful gratification. In what way are we to "think about" Christ, or better, identify with Christ? Given the context, it is not in the sense of justification (justification is the imputation of Christ's righteousness in an identification with his death and resurrection, by grace through faith, whereby we die to the condemnation of sin and rise to right standing in the sight of God). The identification in this passage has ethical or moral implications and is something we must constantly do. Paul is concerned here with the impartation of Christ's righteousness, by grace through faith, whereby we die to the power of sin and rise to new life, renewed daily by the indwelling Spirit of Christ. In practical terms it would be foolish for a believer, renewed by the Spirit, to "deliberately make provision for the satisfaction of the flesh's desires", Cranfield.
An illustration - The vacuum of secular ethics
"I shall no longer ask myself if this or that is expedient, but only if it is right", Alan Paton. Expedience and pragmatism are the ideals of this age. There is no God, there is no right or wrong, there is but one question, "Does it work".
This is an over-simplification, for Western societies are pluralistic; they are societies with many gods, many religions, many beliefs. Yet, most of the religions of our age are not theistic, that is, they are not God centered. We believe in the human spirit, we believe in science, we believe in political theory, or we believe in philosophical ideals. These are the secular religions of our age.
When this mishmash of beliefs is applied to ethical issues, we end up in total confusion. What is right, what is moral? In the face of secular religious certainty, the best we can hope for is an expedient solution.
Let me illustrate. Take the "right" position of the humble toilet seat. The ladies say it is right for it to be down. We men say it is right for it to be up. Pragmatics tell us (that is, the practical position of a toilet seat), and I quote the Apostle here, although totally out of context, it should stay as it is, 1Cor.7:40. Leave it as it is for the next person to adjust it to their appropriate position. Of course, as well we know, matters of such emotional import are never left at the level of expediency. Ever since the humble toilet seat was invented, men have been berated for their selfishness and lack of love in leaving the toilet seat up. It has become an ethical issue, an issue of right and wrong. Yet, it all depends from what angle we view the humble toilet seat. A man might rightly ask the ladies of the household to act in a loving and caring way by leaving it up for him. He may similarly feel offended when he finds it down. So much for right and wrong. My right is often someone else's wrong.
Sadly, our confusion deepens, for our feminist friends, imbibed in the religion of sexist feminism, see in the upturned seat a statement of male dominance, a phallic symbol even. Viewed from the religion of feminism, the upturned seat is an evil of gross proportions. The day may soon be upon us when governments will legislate against free-standing toilet seats. I might comment that a similar ethical argument can be used against leaving the seat in the female "nesting" position.
The point of this absurdity is simple. If there is no God there is no ethics, no morality, no right and wrong, just opinions. We are left with the conclusion that "morality, like beauty, is all in the eye of the beholder."