Textual notes
Abbreviations,
Bibliography
In chapters 9-11 Paul supports his thesis of right-standing before God by grace through faith, expounded in chapters 1 through 8, by examining the divine rejection of the people of Israel. They were the adopted sons of God, theirs was the divine glory, Rom.9:4-5. Yet, how is it that the historic children of God are rejected as the people of God?
Paul, in his letter to the Romans seeks to confront those "whose faith is weak", 14:1. Their problem is nomism (law Christianity - in Paul's day believers who took this position were often members of the circumcision party, judaizers). Today, protestant Christianity is faced with the same error. Many of the believers in Rome saw their Christian life maintained and progressed through obedience to Biblical law. As far as Paul was concerned, to return to the law, having first tasted the grace of God, was to undermine salvation itself, which is wholly by grace through faith. So, in the first 8 chapters of the letter to the Romans, Paul presents his gospel; that by grace through faith we possess the gift of an eternal right-standing in the sight of God, which both frees us and shapes us into the righteous person we are already in Christ.
In chapters 9-11, Paul is able to show that nomism is the main reason why the people of Israel failed to possess their promised inheritance as the children of God. They failed to grasp hold of the possession because it could only be theirs by grace through faith. Yet, they sought it by works of the law, and by works of the law no one is saved. The point being, of course, if the children of promise could lose their inheritance, believers today are no less vulnerable.
Paul details the problem of the rejection of the Jews in three steps:
i] 9:1-29. The true Israel are the spiritual descendants of Abraham - children of promise. They are a remnant saved by the mercy of God.
ii] 9:30-10:21. The immediate problem facing Israel is their misuse of Biblical law. Instead of seeing the law as an instrument to expose sin and drive them to God for mercy, they sought to keep the law as if it could secure and/or improve their standing in the sight of God. Only by faith can a person stand approved in the sight of God.
iii] 11. Gladly, Israel's rejection is neither complete, nor final.
v4
teloV (oV) "[Christ is] the end [of the law]" - end, goal, completion, termination, consummation, fulfilment, result, decision, etc. Scholars are divided as to the sense of this statement. See Moo. Selwyn, in his commentary on first Peter, argues that the word never means "fulfilment", "consumption", but only ever "end", therefore "termination." Those who accept this view tend toward the traditional interpretation that the "end of the law" means that Christ has put to bed, once and for all, the false idea that law-obedience can "establish" right-standing before God, although it is hard to believe that even a faithful Jew thought law-obedience could "establish right-standing. It is certainly likely that nomist believers thought that law-obedience could maintain and/or progress their standing before God. See the new perspective on Paul. How Christ has done this prompts further debate, but he has certainly ended the law-obedience option with his idealized teaching on the law, eg. The Sermon on the Mount. Any sensible reading of the sermon is bound to accept that Christ's words are beyond doing. "Christ ends the law and brings righteousness for everyone who has faith", NEB. Other approaches tend toward either, Christ: i] Completes the law in the sense of giving us a complete understanding of God's perfect expectations; ii] Fulfills the law in the sense of doing it perfectly. Commentators often hold both views in combination and sometimes link them to the meaning "termination." "Christ fulfils the underlying intention of the law and supersedes it", Leenhardt. Sandly and Headlam argue for termination. Cranfield argues that Paul's intention in the passage is to display Christ as the embodiment of the law, but he happily includes fulfilment and termination. The trend seems to be that "end" "implies the cessation of the validity of the old Law", Black.
nomou (oV) "law" - Certainly Paul has in mind the Law of Moses, but a wider sense is likely: "the will of God as a rule of duty, no matter how revealed", Hodge.
eiV "so that there may be" - to, for. Morris notes the following possibilities: "with reference to", result (so that), or purpose ("as a means to righteousness", so NIV). That the preposition introduces a result clause best fits the logic of Paul's argument. Christ has put to bed the crazy notion that law-obedience progresses our standing in the sight of God, and as a result, has provided an uncluttered pathway for everyone to stand in the right before God, by faith and not works of the law. "So that everyone who believes is put right with God", TH.
v5
gar "for" - Links the verse closely to v4.
thn dikaiosunhn (h) "the righteousness [that is by the law]" - the righteousness of the law. Again, "righteousness" is best understood in a judicial sense, of right standing before God as a result of God's act of justifying. This right standing "of the law" is probably an instrumental genitive, "by means of the law." There are a number of ways of understanding "the righteousness of the law", but given the context, a negative sense seems best. There is no right-standing before God by means of the law, because to gain this standing, a person has to do it. So, Paul is contrasting the "right-standing by means of the law" with the "right-standing by means of faith."
oJ poihsaV (poiew) aor. part. "does" - the doing [man]. The person who tries to establish their standing before God by obeying the law, by doing what the law requires; "those who keep the law", JB. As noted above, we often see the law-obedience heresy in terms of obeying the law as the means of gaining right-standing before God. This was not a Jewish concept. A person was a Jew by grace, it was through the gracious act of a sovereign God that they were born into a divinely blessed family. Law-obedience is all about maintaining and progressing one's privileged position, but of course, it doesn't work, in fact, it prompts rebellion. Our standing before God is totally of grace through faith. Paul's focus on this issue is driven by the fact that the same heresy (sanctification by obedience) was infecting the early church.
zhsetai (zaw) fut. "live" - This is always a tricky word as it can mean: i] "to exist"; ii] "to conduct oneself" and iii] "to come alive and exist in a resurrected body in eternity." The natural drift is toward the third option, "shall have life by it", REB, but the second option is best here.
en "by" - in, by, with, to.. The preposition is obviously taking an instrumental sense. A person who obeys the law ("does") as a means to maintain / progress right-standing in the presence of God, will obviously be a person who conducts themselves ("will live") by means of those laws; "he who performs the righteousness required by the law shall live by that righteousness", Weymouth. Obviously, no such person exists; "an impossible task", adds Barrett.
v6
ek + gen. "[but the righteousness] that is by [faith]" - of, out of, from. Although a different preposition is used to "by the law", a similar instrumental sense probably applies, "through faith", TEV; "by faith", NEB. Of course, there are other possibilities, eg. "righteousness based on faith", RSV, = faith-righteousness.
legei mh eiphV (legw) "do not say" - says no say. See above. Paul uses a typical literary device of his time by having a virtue (here "righteousness", ie. right-standing before God that is by grace through faith - the doctrine of justification) speak. The important observation to make is that it speaks in the words of the Old Testament. Paul alludes to Deuteronomy 30:11-14 where Moses makes the point that the keeping of the law is not beyond the people, ie. so remote that keeping it would be as difficult as ascending to heaven, or descending into the deep. Of course, sin made the law impossible to keep, but divine mercy makes its legal keeping possible. Paul has justification say the same thing, namely, what she demands is not difficult. Her demand only requires faith.
katagagein (katagw) aor. inf. "to bring [Christ] down" - To say that right-standing before God through faith is beyond human capability is to demand the Christ descend to earth again and deal again with sin.
v7
abusson (oV) "the deep" - deep. Here, the abyss, Sheol, the place of the dead. Paul reworks the actual quote from Deuteronomy ("who will cross over the sea to get it?") and makes it fit with Jesus' descent into Sheol (the place of the dead, the tomb, but certainly not our concept of hell). The point is the same as above. Right-standing before God is an easy ask, it is simply by grace through faith. To strive for it is to undermine the consequences of Christ's resurrection. It is like working to repeat what Christ has already done - descending into the abyss to raise him up again.
v8
to rJhma (a atoV) "the word" - The way is the way of faith and it definitely is an easy way forward. We need only respond to a "message that calls for faith" TH.
pistewV (iV ewV) "faith" - here the "word of faith" is obviously the gospel. The gospel proclaims that God's righteousness in now ours to claim as a gift of grace. It's not too high or too deep as though it is beyond us.
khrussomen (khrussw) pres. "we are proclaiming" - we preach. Present tense indicates the continued action of evangelizing, proclaiming the gospel.
v9
oJti "that" - that, because, since. The NIV has "that" in the sense that the verse supplies the content of the message/gospel, Morris etc., but a causal "because" is a possibility, ie. the message is proclaimed because it has Christ as its content, eg. Cranfield, a content that is simple to grasp, eg. Moo. Possibly introducing a statement in its own right, eg. Barclay, CEV. The context fits Moo's suggestion.
ean + subj. "if" - Forming a conditional sentence, 3rd. class.
oJmologhshV (oJomologew) aor. subj. "you confess" - you confess, agree, proclaim. Here most likely it means "acknowledge", Goodspeed, although not necessarily public acknowledgement. This verse does seem to be a confessional formula for a new believer. Note, Paul follows the order of Deut.30:14 with "acknowledge" before "believe". He restates his point in v10 with the more natural order of "believe" followed by "acknowledge".
kurion (oV) "Lord" - The confessional formula affirms Jesus as sharing authority with Jehovah, given that "Lord" is constantly ascribed to Jehovah in the Greek Old Testament (LXX). The term "Lord", when applied to Jesus, initially meant "master", but came to convey the very incarnate nature of Christ - God with us.
pisteushV (pisteuw) en th/ kardia/ "believe in your heart" - you believe in the heart. The center of your reasoning, mind, given that "heart" in Greek thought is not the center of our emotions, but the center of reason.
hgeiren (egeirw) aor. "raised" - raise. Here again the substance of the gospel, the decisive and distinctive belief of Christians. It is the primary article of our faith on which we either stand or fall. If Christ lives then we live also. Paul again identifies the resurrection as the distinctive focus of Christian belief, rather than the crucifixion. A point often forgotten in modern gospel presentations.
swqhsh/ (swzw) fut. pas. "saved" - Here referring to the eschatological end of all things, thus eternal life.
v10
pisteuetai (pisteuw) pas. "you believe" - one believes. An impersonal passive, as with "confess" = one confesses. "For it is the heart's faith which brings a person into a right relationship with God, and it is the open assertion of that faith with the lips which brings a person to salvation", Barrett. It is not wise to differentiate between believing and acknowledging. Both are but outward and inward expressions of a single act.
v11
gar "for" - A reason for the value of faith, indicating that "faith" is the issue for Paul, not so much the outward "acknowledgement" of faith.
kataiscunqhsetai (kataiscunomai) fut. pas. "put to shame" - be shamed. Here in the sense of abandoned by God, Isaiah 28:16.
v12
ou diastolh (h) "no difference" - no distinction. The way of salvation by grace through faith is the only way for both Jew and Gentile; "this includes everyone", TEV.
oJ autoV kurioV pantwn "the same Lord is Lord of all" - the same Lord of all. An example of an ellipsis where "is Lord" is understood and so left out. Which "Lord" is intended, God or Christ? Given v9, most likely Jesus is intended.
epikaloumenouV (epikalew) pres. mid. part. "call on" - calling on. In the middle voice the word means call upon, appeal, address. Our word "ask" will probably do and so here Paul identifies another element in the process of Christian belief: believe, acknowledge, ask...... Mind you, there is no mechanical expectation that we must use these elements in some particular order, or even that we must use each one of them independently. In reality, asking is another way of believing, as is acknowledging.
v13
paV "everyone" - Quoting Joel 2:32, Paul again underlines the supremacy of faith and the simplicity of its operation.