Textual notes
Abbreviations,
Bibliography
It is essential to note the typology evident in both the baptism and temptation of Jesus. "Just as the baptism of Jesus represents an identification with the people of God, so also does the narrative of the testing of Jesus. The newly adopted son of God, Israel, experienced testing in the wilderness for forty years, the newly proclaimed Son of God, Jesus, experienced testing in the wilderness for forty days and nights...... Jesus exhibits the faithful obedience of the Son to the Father where Israel failed", Hagner.
It is also important to note that the temptations are most likely a satanic response to the divine revelation at Jesus' baptism ("this is my Son, the beloved, in whom I am well pleased", Isaiah 42:1 with Psalm 2:7) where Jesus' messiahship is both announced and defined in terms of suffering servant and Davidic king. McNeile says of this link, "the first temptation is to doubt the truth of the revelation just received, the second to test it, and the third to snatch prematurely at the messiahship which it involves." Ridderbos takes a similar line, but with a particular emphasis upon messiahship in terms of the suffering servant. Jesus is tempted to grasp at kingship rather find glory in a cross. Why not get all the trimmings of kingship now, "why should you go hungry? Why should you not call up angels, heavenly ministrants?" The easy way to power and glory, to kingship, is for Jesus to "consent to be the associate and representative of the devil." "Jesus resists all the temptations, because he remained true to the vocation that God had given him. He is to rule through suffering."
Of course, proposed interpretations are legion, see notes, v6. The sample sermon follows a conservative line where the messianic vocation of Christ, as corporate Israel, is tested by questioning the validity of messiah's promised provision, authentication and success. In no way is this the last word, but however we handle the individual temptations, we are best to see each as a test of faith. See Nolland, who focuses on wilderness typology in the temptations, but in particular notes that each exposes the need to rely (have faith, rather than obedience [Hagner]) in the divine pledge (covenant promise) to "do well by his son."
There are times when the gospels clearly reveal their underlying oral tradition, and this passage is one such example. It has all the hallmarks of a sermon, of the Christ-story packaged by early Christian preaching - the setting, the three points, the texts ..... all we lack is the local application. The different accounts are also fascinating, particularly comparing Luke with Matthew - the similarities and the differences. We are usually left with the magic "Q" (an possible literary source) to explain the differences, but it would be just so easy for two gospel writers to draw on an existing oral tradition, mostly set, but still with its local idiosyncrasies. The apostles are dying off, those who were the source of the tradition and its verifiers, and so the time had come to get it down on paper as one giant sermon - the gospel.
Anyway, the story of the temptation has a beautiful shape to it.
v1
tote "then" - Matthew drops Marks euqoV (immediately).
anhcqh (anagw) aor. pas. "[Jesus] was led" - Matthew's choice of word, as distinct from Mark and Luke, probably has exodus overtones. Jesus was led into the wilderness as Israel was led into the wilderness.
uJpo + gen. "by [the Spirit]" - Expressing agency.
peirasqhnai (pairazw) aor. inf. pas. "to be tempted" - to be tested. The infinitive expressing purpose; Mark and Luke use a participle. Note how Matthew has the temptation after the 40 days, while Mark and Luke has it during.
eiV "into" - to, into. Mark has en "in" = "into".
tou diabolou (oV) "the devil" - Diabolos is "the enemy", "the tester", "the accuser", "the evil one" who seeks the destruction of Israel and all that is good.
v2
nhsteusaV (nhsteuw) aor. part. "after fasting" - Temporal participle, as NIV. Note how Matthew fills in the details of fasting, ie. going without food for a period, possibly queuing his readers to the "fast" of Israel in the wilderness, Ex.34:28, Deut.9:9. "After a fast of forty days", Phillips.
v3
As with all the temptations, the first test is a test of faith. Will God supply Jesus' needs in the journey to the cross, will he supply Manna for the journey, or should Jesus rely on his own ingenuity. Israel failed this very test in the wilderness in that they doubted God's promised provision. So, the first temptation tests Jesus willingness to rely on God's promised provisiion.
proselqwn (prosercomai) aor. part. "came" - having come, approached [ ... he said]. Attendant circumstance participle identifying action accompanying "said", as NIV.
oJ peirazwn (peirazw) pres. part. "the tempter" - the one tempting, testing. Participle as a substantive descriptive of the devils persona; he tempts to an evil end. The interesting question is whether he can do more than just tempt. It is likely that a whisper is all he needs to keep "the whole world in his hands", v9.
ei + ind. "if" - Introducing a conditional clause, 1st class, where the condition is assumed to be a reality; a real condition /simple conditional assumption, "since", BAGD. "Since you are the Son of God."
uiJoV "the Son [of God]" - An example of Colwell's rule, not "a son of God."
iJna + subj. "[tell these stones to become bread]" - [speak] that [these stones become bread]. The hina clause + the imperatival subjunctive forming a dependent statement indirect speech.
v4
Jesus quotes Deut.8:3, in simple terms, life is determined by God, irrespective bread, for what he says he does. Note Deut.8:2, tying Jesus' answer to the wilderness wanderings of Israel.
oJ "Jesus" - he.
apokriqeiV eipen "answered" - answering he said. Common redundant form of an attendant circumstance participle with a finite verb.
gegraptai (grafw) perf. pas. "it is written" - The perfect tense indicating a past action with ongoing consequences, so "it stands written." A formal introduction to quotations.
epi + dat. "on" - Here with a spacial sense, "on / upon", upon which the action, or result of the action, is based, cf. BAGD.
alla "but" - A strong contrastive.
ekporeuomenw/ ekporeuomai "that comes" - [every word] coming out. Participle is adjectival, "every word which comes out."
dia + gen. "from" - through, by means of [mouth of God]. Instrumental sense.
v5
In Luke the order of the next two temptations is reversed, although Matthew's order seems more appropriate, given the devil's "worship me" is the height of temptations. Actual, or visionary, transportation to the temple is left unstated.
tote "then" - Matthew's favorite temporal indicator. "Next, the Devil took Jesus with him to the Holy City", Rieu.
paralambanei (paralambanw) pres. "took him" - takes. The present tense is probably historic, used for vividness, or dramatic effect.
to pterugion (ou) "the highest point [of the temple]" - The meaning of this word is unclear, but tip or high-point of a building is commonly accepted. It has been suggested that it simply describes the position of the temple itself, given that it was held to be the highest point in Palestine and also the center of the world.
v6
This second temptation, like the first, is a test of faith, but the offered interpretations are legion. Seeing Jesus uses scripture, Satan gives it a go as well, in the terms of "did not the psalmist confidently write about God's deliverance of the righteous? `I will rescue him'", Davies & Allison. Possible interpretations: i] The temptation is often seen in terms of Jesus using his powers to prove his messianic credentials (to himself, or to the crowd? but what crowd?) for the purpose of authentication, cf. Morris: a) authentication of messiahship by a mass demonstration, Lagrange, Beare, Bright, Mounce; "a demonstration of diety", Gundry; b) self authentication of sonship by testing "God's pledge to protect his own", Carson, Plummer, Filson; ii] A more generalized temptation such that Jesus is being tempted to use his powers other than in obedience to God, Davies & Allison; iii] Jesus is being tempted to exploit his relationship with the Father for his own advantage, France, Keener; iv] Jesus is being tempted to secure his safety / preservation, by forcing God's hand (rather than trust his promises?), Hagner; v] In response to the first temptation, Jesus is being tempted to confirm the validity of God's promise of provision/ preservation, Fenton, Patte, Robinson, a "testing of the divine providence", Hill; vi] Jesus is being tempted, on the basis of his privileged status, to demand from God a release from the vagaries of life, Nolland; vii] Tying the temptation to Jesus baptism and the revelation from God: a) Jesus is being tempted to doubt his status as "Son of God", messiah, here in this second temptation, to test it, McNeile; b) Jesus is being tempted to question his role as servant messiah, to seize the crown and its benefits of, provision, ministrants and power, rather than be given his crown by way of the cross (as the suffering servant), Ridderbos.
oJti "-" Introducing direct speech / quotation.
mhpote + subj. "so that you will not strike" - lest you strike. Probably expressing a negated purpose, as NIV. "To ensure that you will never strike your foot against a stone", Barclay.
v7
Jesus' quotes Deut.6:16, a verse which goes on to refer to the testing of God by Israel at Massa, Ex.17:1-7. It was here that Israel questioned God's covenant promise for their security and sought to dictate his protection. The Deuteronomy reference encourages Israel to do better, ie. trust the Lord's covenant fidelity.
efh (afihmi) "[Jesus] answered" - was saying, declaring.
palin "[it is] also" - again. The normal idea, conveyed by this word, of back to a previous state, ie. "again", doesn't seem to work here. "On the other hand", BAGD.
ouk ekpeiraseiV (ekpeirazw) fut. "do not put [the Lord your God] to the test" - do no tempt. Obviously an imperatival future tense. The prefix intensifies. "Don't try to test the Lord your God", CEV.
v8
uJyhlon adj. "high" - Can mean "haughty", obviously here altitude.
deiknusin (deiknumi) pres. "showed" - Probably more in the sense "revealed", exposed the mystery of the secular world. When it comes to understanding human existence, the devil is a sociological expert.
doxan (a) "glory" - "Magnificence", Phillips.
v9
The third and most powerful temptation is the offer of a kingdom without a cross. Jesus will rightly possess an eternal kingdom, his by divine right. Yet, like Israel of old, the way to glory is by a desert path. Satan's compromise will always trouble Jesus, even at the end; "if it is possible, don't let this bitter ordeal come to me", Barclay. Again, we have here a test of faith, either to rely of God and his promise, or satan and his compromise.
dwsw (didwmi) fut. "I will give" - Is it the devil's to give? To what degree does he have the whole world in his hands?
ean + subj. "if" - Introducing a conditional clause, 3rd. class, where the condition proposed in the if clause (protasis) has a possibility of becoming a reality.
proskunhshV (proskunew) "worship" - you may worship, do obeisance. The reader will understand that this word is sometimes translated as if meaning "to serve", but primarily means "to adore." Note how "bow down" virtually exegetes "worship", ie. "to prostrate before."
v10
uJpage (uJpagw) pres. imp. "away from me [Satan]" - "Go away", BAGD; "Begone", Barclay.
latreuseiV (latreuw) fut. ind. "serve [him only]" - you shall serve [him alone]. The future here for "worship" and "serve" is probably hortatory, so NIV. It is this particular word, "to serve", which is often confused with "to worship / to adore." The reason being it is often used of ministry, ie. service to God toward others, so a word applied to priests etc. None-the-less, service is service, and adoration is adoration.
v11
afihsin (afihmi) pres. ind. "left him" - leaves, goes away. Historic present tense. Note Luke's addition, "until a suitable time."
dihkonoun (diakonew) "attended" - were serving [to him]. Imperfect tense expressing durative, sustained action. Originally of waiting on tables. Both Nolland and France suggest that the Angels actually ministered to Jesus' physical needs, cf. 1Kin.19:5-8; "angel food", Davies & Allison. Hagner says that the angels' presence calls attention "to the victory of the obedient son." "The angels came and took care of Jesus", Morris.